Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baker, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Ard, W. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Response to Wehmeyer (1999) and a Challenge to the Field Regarding Self-Determination

Daniel J. Baker

Specialized Training Program, College of Education, University of Oregon

Robert H. Horner

Specialized Training Program, College of Education, University of Oregon

Gary Sappington

Specialized Training Program, College of Education, University of Oregon

William R. Ard, Jr

Specialized Training Program, College of Education, University of Oregon

This article provides a response to an article by Wehmeyer that appeared in the Spring 1999 issue of this journal. Self-determination presents a tremendous opportunity for all persons, and this promise enhances the challenge to prevent self-determination from becoming an empty cliché. To ensure a durable and substantive role for self-determination, the following critical components are needed: (a) a description of self-determination that is conceptually compelling and operational; (b) a sensitive, valid, and reliable method of assessing or measuring the self-determination experienced by an individual; and (c) documentation that efforts to improve self-determination are associated with improvements in the quality of life experienced by persons with disabilities and their families. Wehmeyer and colleagues have contributed greatly to the first of these components. The remaining two components must be the focus of further inquiry, research, and policy analysis.

Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, Vol. 15, No. 3, 154-156 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/108835760001500304


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?