| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
A Response to Wehmeyer (1999) and a Challenge to the Field Regarding Self-DeterminationSpecialized Training Program, College of Education, University of Oregon
Specialized Training Program, College of Education, University of Oregon
Specialized Training Program, College of Education, University of Oregon
Specialized Training Program, College of Education, University of Oregon This article provides a response to an article by Wehmeyer that appeared in the Spring 1999 issue of this journal. Self-determination presents a tremendous opportunity for all persons, and this promise enhances the challenge to prevent self-determination from becoming an empty cliché. To ensure a durable and substantive role for self-determination, the following critical components are needed: (a) a description of self-determination that is conceptually compelling and operational; (b) a sensitive, valid, and reliable method of assessing or measuring the self-determination experienced by an individual; and (c) documentation that efforts to improve self-determination are associated with improvements in the quality of life experienced by persons with disabilities and their families. Wehmeyer and colleagues have contributed greatly to the first of these components. The remaining two components must be the focus of further inquiry, research, and policy analysis.
Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, Vol. 15, No. 3,
154-156 (2000) |
|||