Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Foley, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Heller, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Vocational Rehabilitation Interagency Activity Improving Supported Employment for People with Severe Disabilities

Susan M. Foley

Institute for Community Inclusion

John Butterworth

Institute for Community Inclusion

Amy Heller

University of Massachusetts, Boston

This study is the first of three companion studies investigating the extent of interagency activity among state agencies that deliver or fund employment services. The purpose of this study is to identify exemplary models and strategies used in interagency agreements that improve the delivery of supported employment services. Interagency agreements were most frequent with state agencies that specialized in or had substantial involvement with disability services, including the state mental health (MH) agency, the state mental retardation and developmental disabilities (MR/DD) agency, and the state department of education (DOE). These agreements were seen as having a more positive impact on employment opportunities than agreements with other types of agencies. Agencies that typically provided employment services to the general population were as likely or more likely to be participating in informal interagency activity than in written state level interagency agreements. The impact of these agreements on encouraging supported employment varied by type of agency. The MH and MR/DD agency agreements with the vocational rehabilitation (VR) agency were rated as having the highest impact, whereas the agreements between the One-Stop Career Centers and the VR agency were rated as having no impact, either positive or negative. Implications and suggestions for further research are discussed.

Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, Vol. 15, No. 1, 37-42 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/108835760001500105


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?