This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Ruble, L. A. Articles by Dalrymple, N. J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

An Alternative View of Outcome in Autism

Lisa A. Ruble, MS, is a doctoral candidate in educational psychology at Indiana University and is currently doing her internship at the University of Minnesota. She is the sister of a young woman with autism.

Nancy J. Dalrymple

Nancy J. Dalrymple, MS, is a clinical instructor in the pediatrics department of the Child Evaluation Center at the University of Louisville, where she consults with parents of children with autism and school personnel. Address: Nancy J. Dalrymple, 2312 Montclair Ave., Bloomington, IN 47401.

Parents often rely on the knowledge and experience of others to explain the longitudinal outcomes in autism. Unfortunately, limitations keep parents from obtaining accurate and relevant information. First, professionals with limited experiences are not likely to understand the range of outcomes for persons with autism. Second, previous studies have used narrow explanations to define outcomes. Past researchers have generally defined good outcome as the development of a normal social life and independence by adulthood; and they have defined the best predictors as verbal and IQ levels. Because most individuals with autism continue to struggle with social relationships and need individualized supports, this outcome is rare. Parents, educators, and researchers need other frameworks now to characterize and conceptualize "good outcome." Data on 46 individuals with autism will be used to present an alternative view of outcome. Some who would have been predicted to do poorly as adults because of their relatively low verbal, cognitive, and adaptive behavior levels were found to be leading satisfactory lives. To illustrate the multitude of variables that have an impact on outcome and to propose the claim that competency and quality of life are the best criteria for judging outcomes, we present four case studies.

Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, Vol. 11, No. 1, 3-14 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/108835769601100102


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?